In a show of unity at the continuing Zionist occupation and oppression, Palestinians from all walks of life went on a general strike (dubbed Karameh – the Arabic word for “dignity”) on May 18 which has not been seen since 1936 as part of the uprising under the then British Mandatory Palestine.
The 1936 general strike led to the establishment of the Peel Commission which laid down the first idea for a partition. Jerusalem and the “central zone” of Palestine would come under a British-led international administration (at that time, the League of Nations). The entirety of the West Bank and southern Palestine (including Gaza) would fall under Jewish territory.
Much has been said about Arab rejectionism since then. But some context would provide clarity and appreciation of the (original) position of the Palestinian Arabs.
According to Shaul Bartal in “The Peel Commission Report of 1937 and the Origins of the Partition Concept” (Jewish Political Studies Review, 2017), the Arabs in the form of the Arab Higher Committee (AHC) rejected it and instead demanded a fully-fledged (as in geographically) Arab nation – separate from what’s to become the then Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan – to reflect demographic realities. The argument in favour of an independent State of Palestine and rejection of a Jewish “national homeland” (as per the Balfour Declaration) was encapsulated in the book, The Palestine Mandate, Invalid and Impracticable: A Contribution of Arguments and Documents towards the Solution of the Palestine Problem (1936) by W F Boustany (a member of the Third Palestine Arab Delegation to London in 1923).
Whilst there were already Jews living in Palestine from time immemorial together with the Judaised and non-Jewish communities, the last of the Jewish rebellion against Roman imperial rule resulted in the ever-decrease of the Jewish indigenous population through expulsion and immigration. By the time of the rise of Christianity, there’s already an established Jewish diaspora. This together with the migration of the Ghassanid (i.e., pre-Islamic Arabs) from the 3rd century onwards into Palestine. With the Christianisation of Palestine under Byzantine (Roman East) rule, Christian immigration from the rest of the empire further intensified.
Therefore, Jews who migrated to Palestine under the banner of Zionism were, to put it simply, immigrants (foreigners) – unlike their minority compatriots who could trace their lineage unbroken.
Furthermore, the Jewish (as in ethnic) origins of the immigrant settlers could be questioned on genetic grounds as argued in Israeli historian Shlomo Sands’ The Invention of the Jewish People (2009). Prof Sand’s other book, The Invention of the Land of Israel (2012) demonstrates convincingly (even as from a neutral standpoint) that the biblical Land of Israel (Erezt Yisrael) is not, historically and geographically, coterminous with the State of Israel (Medinat Yisrael).
In short, not only had the demographics in Palestine start to change by the time of the Christianisation of the Roman Empire, Arabisation – Christian (see Doron Bar’s “The Christianisation of Rural Palestine during Late Antiquity”, 2003 as published in the Journal of Ecclesiastical History) and Muslim – changed the social landscape.
Of course, being at the cross-roads of many of the civilisations of antiquity and bridge between cultures and regions and continents, the land of “Palestine” has seen waves and waves of migrations from all geographical directions.
The reality is that Palestinian acceptance of the two-state solution based on the 1949 Armistice Agreement – otherwise known as the Pre-1967 War/Green Line – coupled with the settlements in the West Bank and Netanyahu’s threatened annexation can only demonstrate to the world one thing.
And that’s Zionist rejectionism.
Only recently, the Palestinian Ambassador Walid Abu Ali was quoted by The Star in affirming that, “[Both parties] must return to the negotiating table on a two-state settlement based on the territorial lines before the 1967 war”.
So much for so-called Arab rejectionism.
Zionist rejectionism is also expressed in successive strategic bombings of Gaza by Israel – with the aim of destroying infrastructure so as to degrade and weaken the will of the Gazans to resist (punitive action).
In the aftermath of the latest cease-fire following yet another round of war crime, it’s incumbent upon the aggressor to take steps to end the cycle of massacre and destruction once and for all by seriously working towards a two-state solution.
Concomitantly, the Tel Aviv regime must unilaterally withdraw and disengage from the West Bank in whole or at least in part leaving the rest of the settlements under Palestinian administration.
In the case of the latter, the plan could include the concept that the remaining settlements (that were not dismantled), particularly the more established and sophisticated ones that have become self-contained towns or cities in their own right, would be designated as special zones. These zones would come under the jurisdiction of the State of Palestine (Dawlat Filastin). Hence, the settlers living there would be “guests” and subject to the laws of the land and a special poll tax (levied per capita or on each person), in addition to conventional taxes (property assessment, income, corporate).
The idea of the lack of “strategic depth” of which Benjamin Netanyahu is perhaps the most famous proponent (see his book, Durable Peace: Israel and its Place Among the Nations, 2000) has been bandied around by Zionists as justification for settler expansionism into the West Bank.
Strategic depth is simply the “space” by which a country would need in order to successfully defend itself from an invasion.
But it’s a specious argument that lacks in-depth grounds.
Such is the pathology of Zionist rejectionism.
Firstly, the inclusion of the West Bank may add depth to the State of Israel but not strategically, especially in relation to air invasion. The distance from Jerusalem to Jericho near the border with Jordan is only 25.6 km.
Fighter jets could easily swoop past West Bank to bomb urban centres inside Israel with no sweat. Unless, of course, Israel’s air defences and air force have the latest and most sophisticated technology to counter the threat which they do.
That’s to say, “strategic depth” is irrelevant to Israel’s defence in any aerial invasion.
Secondly, it presumes that a sovereign State of Palestine would be inherently hostile to Israel and would someday seize the moment to invade – with aim of finally realising a one-state solution, instead. Assuming that this argument is sound – which it isn’t – this would by default presuppose and imply Israeli military and intelligence failure.
Failure to detect signs of impending invasion. It would be highly unlikely given the close proximity of the two countries as well as the track record of Mossad and Shin Bet.
Failure to prepare in advance which would be highly unlikely given the track record of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), especially in terms of air superiority.
Failure to mobilise its population (both male and female) in the form of the mandatory national military service would be inconceivable.
In fact, in the event of a future Arab-Israeli conflict, the strategic depth would be immaterial because the likely route of invasion would probably come from the north.
Syria – with the backing of Iran and Russia – remains a formidable opponent, not least determined to rightfully regain the Golan Heights which it lost in the 1967-Six Day War and perhaps Turkey joining in too by air and sea in relation to Gaza (south). Iran is in the position to move armaments and troops into Syria. By extension, both are in a position to move (back) into Lebanon with the support of Hezbollah as a stabilising force in that country.
An invasion coming from southern Lebanon with the aim of encircling/enveloping the Golan Heights from the “rear” with the other pincer movement directly from Syria would shatter the IDF garrisons. At the same time, this giant double envelopment allows for a new buffer zone to be created between Lebanon and Israel – as bargaining chip for Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.
Another Intifada (Uprising) in the West Bank and Gaza would add to the pressure on the Tel Aviv regime – perhaps weakening domestic political arrangements.
Basically, whether such scenario will materialise or not, Israel by stubbornly holding onto the West Bank might only be setting itself up for another regional conflict – the dynamics of which would be different from past Arab-Israeli wars.
In short, Zionist rejectionism should not be seen as a result of Zionist triumphalism.
It could well be the beginning of the end. As the saying goes, the rest is history.
Jason Loh Seong Wei is Head of Social, Law & Human Rights at EMIR Research, an independent think tank focussed on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research.
** The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of Astro AWANI.
Jason Loh Seong Wei
Tue May 25 2021
A child waves a Palestine's flag during a rally organised to express solidarity with Palestinian people. Filepic/REUTERS
Dua individu ditahan bantu siasatan minta, terima sogokan daripada firma guaman
SPRM menahan dua individu selama empat hari bagi membantu siasatan berkaitan penerimaan wang suapan daripada beberapa firma guaman.
Operasi PeWA: JPJ Pulau Pinang sita 22 kenderaan, keluar 63 saman
JPJ Pulau Pinang menyita 22 kenderaan yang dipandu warga asing dalam Ops Khas Pemandu Warga Asing (PeWA) di Bulatan Tun Hussain Onn, Seberang Jaya.
Lisa BLACKPINK beli rumah ‘tersorok’ di Beverly Hills, harga RM19 juta
Tidak ada yang mengejutkan apabila Lisa BLACKPINK telah menambah satu lagi aset berbentuk kediaman.
Stoking tertera kalimah Allah: Hukuman penjara, denda terhadap Wai Loong dibatalkan
Hakim membenarkan semakan difailkan tertuduh supaya pengakuan bersalah dibuatnya atas pertuduhan berkenaan, bukan akuan jelas dan tanpa bersyarat.
[TERKINI] Letusan Gunung Ruang: Indonesia keluar amaran tahap tertinggi
Pihak berkuasa Indonesia meningkatkan amaran keselamatan ke tahap tertinggi selepas Gunung Ruang yang meletus beberapa kali di Kepulauan Sangihe kelmarin, mengeluarkan asap setinggi lebih 1.6 kilometer (km) sehingga memaksa ratusan penduduk dipindahkan.
Mengenang sumbangan dan jasa Joseph Kurup
Pensyarah Kanan Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Dr Romzi Ationg berkongsi pandangan dan memperingati sumbangan dan jasa mendiang Joseph Kurup.
Ronaldo digantung dua perlawanan kerana berkelakuan ganas
Cristiano Ronaldo digantung dua perlawanan kerana menyiku lawan dan mengancam menyerang pengadil selepas Al Nassr tewas kepada Al Hilal.
PBAPP akan lepas air dari EMD jika Sungai Muda terus menyusut
PBAPP boleh melepaskan maksimum 600 juta liter air mentah sehari (JLH) dari EMD yang berfungsi sebagai sumber sokongan kemarau apabila Sungai Muda terus menyusut berikutan cuaca kering.
TikTok mulakan ujian untuk aplikasi perkongsian gambar dan teks
TikTok Notes akan memudahkan perkongsian perkembangan harian dengan lebih mudah dan kreatif menggunakannya.
Amir Hamzah ketuai delegasi Malaysia ke mesyuarat IMF, Bank Dunia di Washington
Amir Hamzah mengetuai delegasi Malaysia ke Washington, Amerika Syarikat bagi menghadiri Mesyuarat Musim Bunga IMF dan Kumpulan Bank Dunia.
Berita antarabangsa pilihan sepanjang hari ini
Antara pelbagai berita luar negara yang disiarkan di Astro AWANI, berikut adalah yang paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari ini.
AS lebih waras bertindak balas terhadap tindakan Iran serang Israel - Penganalisis
Amerika Syarikat menunjukkan sikap yang lebih waras dalam mengendalikan insiden serangan balas Iran terhadap pengeboman Israel terhadap kedutaannya di Damsyik.
[LAPOR LANGSUNG] Tindak balas dahsyat jika kepentingan Iran diserang - Presiden Iran
Ebrahim beri amaran sebarang tindakan walaupun kecil terhadap kepentingan Iran akan disambut dengan tindak balas dahsyat dan menyakitkan.
Israel kini dalam kedudukan defensif - Penganalisis
Rejim Israel ketika ini dalam kedudukan bertahan susulan pelbagai tekanan serta impak negatif yang dirasai susulan kempen perang keatas Gaza dilancarkan.
Iran sekadar beri mesej, Israel perlu hentikan serangan - Penganalisis
Tindakan Iran melancarkan peluru berpandu kelas dua adalah mesej kepada Israel untuk menghentikan segala serangan dan tindakan rakus yang menyebabkan krisis kemanusiaan di rantau Asia Barat.
Malaysia perlu tegas, apa yang berlaku di Palestin boleh terjadi di negara ini - Herizal
Malaysia perlu menyatakan pendirian yang tegas agar sebanrang bentuk serangan dari Israel mesti dihentikan.
Konflik Iran-Israel: Kelantan hubungi pelajar di Jordan ambil langkah keselamatan
Kerajaan Kelantan telah menghubungi semua pelajar dari negeri ini yang sedang menyambung pengajian di Jordan susulan tindakan Iran melancarkan serangan ke atas Israel.
Kedutaan Thailand pantau rapat konflik Iran-Israel
Semua kedutaan Thailand di rantau Timur Tengah telah diarahkan untuk terus memantau ketegangan antara Iran dan Israel.
Tentera Israel lakukan 16 pembunuhan beramai-ramai sehari sejak 7 Okt
Sepanjang serangan tentera Israel ke atas Semenanjung Gaza, 14,560 kanak-kanak dan 9,582 wanita maut.
Jordan pertahan tindakan pintas dron Iran
Negara itu konsisten dengan polisinya bahawa ia akan bertindak ke atas pencerobohan pihak asing di ruang udaranya.