KUALA LUMPUR: In Malaysia, our political and, by extension and inclusion, economic system has been largely driven by and over-reliant on patronage, especially in the form of “money politics” (within the party concerned) and cronyism (in government). Money politics, in the form of cash or in kind (e.g., government contracts), are the embodiment and personification of how corruption is so embedded and “enshrined” within our society – as the “tentacles” and nexuses (i.e., linkages) spread throughout the complex networks of the inter-dependent political and economic relations of the actors and stakeholders.
One particular area, however, that has not received adequate coverage and attention is in the relationship between charitable bodies or social entities otherwise also known as trusts, namely foundations (yayasan), and their political patrons.
Foundations are supposed to be not-for-profit in nature and hence should be managed as such even if registered as a company/corporate entity under the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM) instead of typically under the Registrar of Societies (ROS).
The C4 (Centre to Combat Corruption & Cronyism) in its report on the specific nexus between foundations and political financing/funding – “Foundations and Donations: Political Financing, Corruption, and the Pursuit of Power” (Prof E Terence Gomez & Lalitha Kunaratnam) – has revealed the “shocking” extent to which such arrangements run deep in our political culture and system.
The 57-page report is replete with damning evidence of the complete lack of transparency and accountability in the source, use and purpose of the funds that flow into the foundations set up by the political elite concerned.
Due to the lack of constraint, the misuse of such funds is an “open season”. As the media release/press statement of C4 states, “[the intersection between foundations and political donations [results in murky waters] as the vulnerability for quid pro quo [something for something] arrangements exist, meaning the system itself is vulnerable to corruption by those in power”. And these, of course, include foundations or trusts set up by the federal government for the purpose of the bumiputera empowerment agenda.
And there’s the direct and straightforward cases involving criminal breach of trust (CBT). For example, the prosecution of Nasharuddin Mat Isa (former Deputy President of Pas and former Member of Parliament for Yan in Kedah as well as Bachok in Kelantan) has proceeded with 17 counts of CBT and three money laundering charges even as he was given a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) for the other 16 counts of CBT (see pp. 53-56).
The report traces back the origins of foundations as vehicles for “slush funds” (particularly for a party’s war chest to be activated for electoral campaigning) to the 1980s when patronage politics had begun to emerge under the guise of corporatisation and privatisation as part of the overall policy to expedite the nation’s industrialisation and ensure the creation of a bumiputera commercial and industrial community (BCIC) (p. 5).
For example, concessions (i.e., government awards) were directly given to selected private proxies of which the ultimate beneficiary or owner was the then ruling party of Umno – the household names in those days were Renong and UEM (now merged into the UEM Group controlled by Khazanah, our “sovereign wealth fund”).
To be sure, Malaysia isn’t unique in this as Prof Terence Gomez has highlighted in the book, Political Business in East Asia (Routledge, 2002). See also China in Malaysia: State-business relations and the new order of investment flows (Palgrave MacMillan, 2020) in relation to the nexus between politics or, more precisely, the State (government) with business, including GLCs/state-owned enterprises (from both Malaysia and China).
Hence, just as there are government-linked companies (GLCs) that are deployed to funnel low-key donations, there are Umno-linked companies (“ULCs”) which also served as conduits for the party’s source of secret slush funds. It’s from these practices involving the nexus between politics and business (corporate) that foundations too became entangled in the orbit of political patronage.
As a quick summary, according to the report, the lessons learnt from the current or on-going court cases involving prominent erstwhile ruling elites are, among others:
• (mis)use of family-controlled foundations as convenient cover for personal lucre;
• wielding absolute control over foundations in their capacity as cabinet members;
• complete lack of transparency, e.g., total absence of audit exercises;
• in most cases, donations weren’t even used for genuine party political purposes, e.g., to cover full-time staff and other expenses; and
• except for the politician concerned, the rest of the party were unaware of existence of the donations. Even if the existence is known, in terms of the subsequent expenditure trail, it’d be off-limits. This meant that these secret war chests could well have been derived from corrupt intentions. In other words, the funds weren’t donations as such in the first place but had the sinister quid pro quo aim (of securing favours in exchange for cash).
Notwithstanding, this doesn’t mean that State capitalism or pro-active government intervention in the economy in the form of GLCs is necessarily unhealthy and, therefore, bad. Rather, there needs to be (greater) transparency and accountability in how the myriads of our GLCs operate and are run.
By the same token, we need to move towards a more transparent political funding culture even as we cannot expect to, realistically, eradicate the practice and culture of “business donating to politics”, including not least in the context of foundations.
As such, the issue is corrupt practices and, thus, how best to control and minimise abuse.
The courts cases have shown that we only need the political will to prosecute wrongdoing. As for prevention which is certainly better than cure, perhaps it’s far better to:
• limit the number of foundations (e.g., to only 3 as the maximum) that can be set up and managed by politicians, family members and politically-connected persons;
• establish an independent “ombudsman” or auditor whose role is to audit and monitor flow of funds into foundations and the expenses as well as act on irregularities and complaints; and that the report is available to the public online;
• make it mandatory under legislation (e.g., under the Political Financing Act as called for by C4) for the financial statements of foundations to be made available to the public online.
More broadly, the National Centre for Governance, Integrity and Anti-Corruption (GIACC) is currently pushing for a rule that requires the disclosure of the source of political funding above RM10,000. To complement and supplement this policy proposal, layers of corporate veils deployed to mask the identity of the funder – as a common tactic – should be countered with the mandatory requirement for the disclosure of beneficial ownership analogous to proxy share ownership holding in trust for the real owner. In the same vein, such proposed measures would strengthen and enhance the existing Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act/Amla (2001) and Banking & Financial Institution Act/Bafia (1989).
Not least, we should be seriously studying the political funding models in other countries. In Germany, the government provides funds for political parties during elections. Germany’s Political Parties Act (1967) stipulates that the State will fund the parties to partly finance their general activities, and the criteria for the distribution of public funds would be the parties’ performance in the European Parliament, Bundestag (federal parliament) and Landtag (state parliament).
Public funding would reduce political parties’ dependency on corporate donations, thus preventing corporations from undue influence on policy-making. This system also ensures that the elected government and representatives work for the public interest, thus upholding democracy. However, a political funding system that’s completely tax-payer dependent would be unsuitable and not feasible.
In the final analysis, the right approach is probably to find or strike the right balance – with the ultimate purpose of eradicating corrupt practices.
Jason Loh Seong Wei is Head of Social, Law & Human Rights at EMIR Research, an independent think tank focussed on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research.
** The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of Astro AWANI.
Jason Loh Seong Wei
Thu May 06 2021
We need to move towards a more transparent political funding culture even as we cannot expect to, realistically, eradicate the practice and culture of "business donating to politics", including not least in the context of foundations. AWANIpic
Kes Nora Anne | Kematian Nora Anne bukan disebabkan nahas
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Serempan memaklumkan kematian remaja perempuan Perancis-Ireland, Nora Anne Quoirin, dua tahun lalu, bukan disebabkan oleh peristiwa malang atau nahas. Sebaliknya, Hakim Azizul Azmi Adnan menggantikan punca kematian remaja itu dengan keputusan terbuka dan membatalkan keputusan Mahkamah Koroner pada 4 Januari lalu.
Suntikan Vaksin | 1,500 lagi petugas media terima suntikan dos pertama
kira-kira 1,500 lagi petugas media akan menerima suntikan dos pertama vaksin COVID-19 dalam minggu ini.
Vaksin | Pendaftaran golongan OKU masih rendah
Jumlah golongan kurang upaya (OKU) yang mendaftar bagi menerima suntikan vaksin dalam Program Imunisasi COVID-19 Kebangsaan (PICK) masih rendah. Menurut Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat, Datuk Seri Rina Mohd Harun, setakat ini hanya 240,991 oku telah mendaftar berbanding jumlah keseluruhan 600,000 OKU yang berada dalam pangkalan data jabatan kebajikan masyarakat.
Sidang Kemuncak antara Biden, Putin di Geneva selesai dalam masa beberapa jam
Pertemuan bersejarah itu dimulakan dengan kedua-dua mereka berjabat tangan di hadapan pintu masuk venue pertemuan di Villa la Grange.
Vaksin COVID-19 | Bekas polis berusia lebih 100 tahun terima suntikan vaksin
Seorang bekas anggota Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) berusia lebih 100 tahun hari ini hadir untuk mendapatkan dos pertama vaksin COVID-19 di Dewan Jubli Perak Sultan Ahmad Shah, Kuala Lipis.
Segerakan Parlimen | UMNO hargai kecaknaan Agong, Majlis Raja-Raja
UMNO menghargai kecaknaan Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Mustafa Billah Shah yang mengambil kira segala isu dan pendirian parti yang dipersembahkan kepada Baginda pada 11 Jun lalu. Ujar Presiden, Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, pandangan yang dikemukakan untuk menyegerakan persidangan Parlimen jelas menzahirkan kebijaksanaan dan keprihatinan Seri Paduka Baginda dan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Raja-Raja.
Buka Parlimen | Anwar tunggu langkah Muhyiddin selanjutnya
Pengerusi Pakatan Harapan (PH), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menanti langkah selanjutnya daripada Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin dalam isu pembukaan Parlimen.
10 Berita Pilihan - (16 Jun 2021)
Antara pelbagai berita dalam dan luar negara yang disiarkan di Astro AWANI, berikut adalah yang paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari ini.
Berita tempatan pilihan sepanjang hari ini
Berikut antara berita paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang Rabu, 16 Jun 2021.
Mapim sambut baik keputusan Agong, Raja-Raja Melayu
Kerajaan wajar mengambil perhatian keputusan yang telah diumumkan oleh Yang di-Pertuan Agong pada petang Rabu.
Pemilihan UMNO: RoS, MKN perlu jujur tetapkan SOP
Ramai ahli UMNO berharap pemilihan dapat diadakan pada tahun ini juga dan mereka akan patuh dengan peraturan ditetapkan RoS dan MKN.
Pemilihan UMNO tahun ini, ramai akar umbi lega - KB Kapar
Keputusan mengadakan Pemilihan UMNO tahun ini melegakan ahli parti untuk memilih kepimpinan baharu dan menggerakkan parti pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke-15 (PRU15) nanti.
MUDA cabar Menteri Dalam Negeri, RoS berhubung pendaftaran parti
Syed Saddiq yang merupakan pengasas parti itu serta 12 individu selaku pemohon memfailkan permohonan itu di Mahkamah Tinggi di sini menerusi firma guaman Sreenevasan.
MAQIS rampas bunga ros dari Ethiopia bernilai lebih RM43,000
MAQIS merampas 1,208 kilogram (kg) keratan bunga ros segar dari negara Ethiopia bernilai RM43,210.65.
Berhati-hati main kutu - Peguam
Main kutu tradisional dalam kalangan rakan atau keluarga adalah sah mengikut RoS, tetapi ia boleh menyalahi undang-undang dalam dua situasi.
Pendaftaran Pejuang, MUDA ditolak kerana perlembagaan parti tidak teratur - Hamzah
Pejuang telah mengemukakan rayuan kepada Menteri Dalam Negeri berhubung pendaftaran parti itu setelah permohonan mereka ditolak, bagaimanapun MUDA masih belum berbuat demikian.
16 bekas ahli UMNO cabar keputusan RoS, bukan keputusan parti politik
Peguam mereka Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla berhujah bahawa kesemua ahli UMNO terbabit bukan mencabar keputusan dalaman parti politik itu secara langsung.
Jabatan Peguam Negara bantah permohonan MUDA cabar tindakan RoS tolak pendaftaran parti
Bantahan itu dibuat atas alasan permohonan tersebut adalah pramatang dan penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah.
Guna logo Warisan atau Amanah mungkin pilihan terakhir Pejuang - Mahfuz
Parti yang dipimpin bekas Menteri Besar Kedah, Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir itu akan melakukan rayuan terhadap permohonan berkenaan.
Penolakan pendaftaran Pejuang ada kaitan pengaruh politik - Tun M
Dr Mahathir Mohamad mendakwa keputusan menolak pendaftaran Pejuang ada kaitan dengan pengaruh politik.