The High Court here was told today that the suit brought by former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak against AmBank and its former relationship manager, Joanna Yu Ging Ping must go for a full trial as it involved breach of duty of the bank and its officer.
Najib's counsel, Harvinderjit Singh submitted that there were suspicious transactions in his client's Ambank accounts.
“The bank had knowledge about the matter but they failed to lodge a report to the authority. This a serious issue," he said, adding that the suit had nothing to do with SRC International Sdn Bhd's case faced by his client.
Harvinderjit was making his submission in objecting an application by AmBank, AMMB Holdings Berhad and Yu and to strike out the suit brought by the former prime minister.
The lawyer also contended that the bank did not inform Najib about the suspicious transactions and his client only found out about this during his RM42 million SRC International trial last year.
“AmBank was already (allegedly) found guilty (by Bank Negara) for not reporting suspicious transactions in the plaintiff’s accounts. We did not know. AmBank did not disclose it to us. The authorities did not inform us until the SRC proceedings,” he said.
Meanwhile, AmBank’s counsel Yoong Sin Min submitted that Najib's claim should be struck out as the lawsuit was filed by Najib for the collateral attack in the SRC proceedings.
"The plaintiff's (Najib) claim was filed for the collateral attack, namely to thwart and interfere with the SRC International proceedings instituted against him," she said.
Yoong said the plaintiff's claim that he was manipulated for RM42 million but the former prime minister never lodged a police report.
"The plaintiff should be aware of the movement of the money from his accounts," she said.
Lawyer Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar, representing Yu, argued that the suit filed against his client was only meant for the collateral attack by Najib relating to his SRC case.
"The SRC case faced by Najib was heard in the criminal court…How was it possible for the same case to be brought to the civil court?” he said, adding that this action was an abuse of the court's process.
Najib, through Messrs Shafee Co, had filed the suit on Dec 9, last year at the High Court and named AmBank, AMMB Holdings Berhad and Yu as the defendants.
According to the statement of claim, the plaintiff contended that AmBank and Yu had committed negligence when handling his bank accounts (ending with 694, 880, 898 and 906) by disclosing these to fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho or Jho Low.
Najib claimed that the defendants without authorisation had disclosed his bank statements, debit and credit remittance transactions, and balances of funds of account 694 to Low as the third party.
He claimed that the defendants did not engage with him to report on Low’s action regarding the said bank account and that the bank had facilitated the unauthorised third party to make money transfers between accounts 880, 898 and 906.
The Pekan Member of Parliament contended that he had been kept in the dark about the details of his own bank accounts statements and other related documents by the bank under Low’s instruction.
He alleged that Low with the help of other unauthorised third parties, had made 20 transactions to regularise the accounts totalling RM12 million through several local and foreign remittances of funds and that the accounts had been ‘red-flagged’ by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM).
The former prime minister said the defendants failed to report and get direct instructions from him despite the accounts being red-flagged.
Najib also claimed that he only discovered the act committed by the defendants during the SRC International trial after the prosecution had revealed the conversations between Yu and third parties.
He is seeking special, general, aggravated and exemplary damages from the defendants.
On July 28, Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali convicted and sentenced Najib to 12 years’ imprisonment and fined him RM210 million over the SRC International criminal case.
The hearing before judge Datuk Khadijah Idris continues tomorrow.
-- BERNAMA
Bernama
Mon Aug 17 2020
Najib, through Messrs Shafee Co, had filed the suit on Dec 9, last year at the High Court and named AmBank, AMMB Holdings Berhad and Yu as the defendants. -File picture
Angka kematian lebuh raya runtuh di China meningkat kepada 36
Angka kematian akibat sebahagian lebuh raya di wilayah Guangdong, selatan China runtuh meningkat kepada 36 orang, kata pihak berkuasa tempatan, lapor Xinhua.
PRK Kuala Kubu Baharu: Tular pula isu hutang, calon PN enggan jawab
Calon PN bagi PRK Kuala Kubu Bharu, Khairul Azhari Saut sekali lagi terpalit dakwaan hutang melibatkan perkhidmatan kredit komuniti.
Bursa Malaysia dibuka rendah
Pada 9.05 pagi, FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) merosot 1.21 mata kepada 1,574.76 daripada 1,575.97 pada Selasa.
UUM dan tiga wilayah di Selatan Thailand rintis kerjasama pendidikan tinggi
Kerjasama yang diberi keutamaan ialah latihan perguruan dan kursus berkaitan bahasa Inggeris bagi pelajar dan tenaga pengajar.
Perkembangan terkini Jelajah Microsoft Build: AI Day
Acara sehari secara percuma yang direka untuk membantu pembangun meneroka peluang baharu dengan kecerdasan buatan (AI) serta memajukan kemahiran mereka dengan AI dan Microsoft Azure.
[TERKINI] Siti Bainun dihukum penjara 12 tahun
Pengasas Rumah Bonda, Siti Bainun Ahd Razali dihukum penjara 12 tahun oleh Mahkamah Tinggi pada khamis, atas dua pertuduhan mengabai dan menganiaya remaja perempuan sindrom down, yang juga dikenali dengan nama Bella, tiga tahun lalu.
Harus renjis, bilas kenderaan dengan air ruqyah - Mufti
Perbuatan tersebut bukanlah satu amalan yang khurafat dan tidak bertentangan dengan syariat.
WEF: Emerging economies: How to fix the debt problem?
Papagomo didakwa hasut, datangkan kebencian terhadap Agong
Wan Muhammad Azri didakwa menerbitkan penerbitan menghasut berkaitan isu pemilik KK Supermart menghadap Sultan Ibrahim di laman X miliknya.
Siti Bainun kekal bersalah abai, aniaya Bella
Hakim, Datuk Noorin Badaruddin memutuskan demikian selepas menolak rayuan Siti Bainun.
Najib tidak persoal Ambank tentang jumlah besar wang 'keluar masuk' dalam akaun peribadinya
Tiada sebarang tindakan undang-undang diambil terhadap bank itu atas dakwaan dana dikredit dan didebit secara salah ke akaunnya.
AmBank beri moratorium enam bulan kepada mangsa banjir
Moratorium itu merangkumi ansuran bulanan atau pembayaran balik bagi semua fasiliti pinjaman dan pembiayaan termasuk kemudahan kad kredit.
Moratorium berakhir: AmBank tawar bantuan pembayaran balik pada hujung minggu
Ambank menawarkan bantuan pembayaran balik pada hujung minggu melalui Ambank Assist.
AmBank akan agih RM20 bilion pinjaman PKS dalam tempoh 3 tahun
Kumpulan AmBank menyedari keperluan untuk bergerak lebih jauh lagi dalam membantu syarikat dengan pembiayaan.
Here are the three considerations we had when we did the Budget - Tony Pua
Damansara MP Tony Pua explained the three major considerations on what went into the development and execution of Budget 2019.
Kumpulan AmBank akan siasat CAGM
Kumpulan AmBank akan menyiasat kumpulan yang menggelarkan diri mereka Citizens for Accountable Governance (CAGM) di atas penipuan yang dilakukan organisasi itu.
Najib dinasihat berehat sementara siasatan dakwaan WSJ dijalankan
Najib Tun Razak dinasihatkan berehat daripada menguruskan sebarang tugas pentadbiran negara ketika siasatan ke atas dakwaan Wall Street Journal (WSJ) berhubung penyaluran AS$700 juta ke akaunnya.
Adakah pembunuhan pengasas AmBank ada kaitan dengan 1MDB? - Kit Siang
Penasihat DAP menggesa polis membuka semula kes pembunuhan pengasas AmBank Hussein Ahmad Najadi yang ditembak mati di Lorong Ceylon Julai 2013 lalu.
'Kenapa Najib tak nafi akaun AmBank itu bukan miliknya?' - Mahfuz
Datuk Mahfuz Omar mempersoal mengapa Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak tidak menafikan nombor akaun AmBank yang dilaporkan WSJ.
'BAFIA halang AmBank, BNM dedah pemilik akaun kontroversi' - Khalid Ibrahim
Pihak AmBank atau BNM disifatkan tidak boleh mendedahkan nombor akaun yang didedahkan Wall Street Journal yang didakwa atas nama Najib wujud atau sebaliknya.