Is a standard template or app the key to bringing down legal fees? Would there be setbacks? Would the law become more accessible and understandable? These are questions both lawyers and public must weigh and consider before liberating the legal profession to non-legally trained Malaysians.
In principle, I agree that lower legal fees would mean better accessibility by ordinary Malaysians. It was argued that documents such as sales & purchase agreements, uncontested wills and probate, accident claims, divorce petitions, mitigation and bail in criminal cases are not as complicated as imagined, and therefore the public can cut down on legal fees through readily made templates and apps.
But before agreeing that templates and apps are a feasible move, it is important for the public to be aware and cautious of the possible pitfalls that might result in a layperson going through cumbersome disputes in future.
Firstly, it is important to note that not all sales and purchase (S&P) agreements are straightforward. Even lawyers at times, get confused with terms or phrases used. On top of that, ownership of a property is not the only thing stated in an agreement. There are rights and obligations of parties at stake which has to be consistent with the existing legal framework and legislations. Is the public aware of this?
To sink deeper into the mire, the laws governing the validity of these agreements differ according to states and places. Now, would a layperson be fully aware of these? The pitfalls are there. If overlooked, one might not even be aware of a breach.
To put these into perspective: A buyer of a newly built landed house might be able to draft a self-written S&P agreement, but what about a faulty land title which the layperson is not aware of? Or perhaps an apartment without a strata title which has changed hands a few times? Does a layperson know he risks being at the mercy of the developer’s prudence? Will he know the risks should he decide to resell the property in future?
Unlike applications or forms, a person drafting legal documents cannot safely complete an agreement simply by filling up the blanks. Lawyers are trained to deal with banks, proprietors, land offices, developers and most importantly, they are trained to foresee the risks and implications involved.
Have you not heard that even lawyers do run into trouble sometimes? When a layperson runs into trouble, where will he go? Back to a lawyer of course. At the end of the day, would it be cheaper or costlier? It very much depends, really. It is irresponsible for lawyers to lead the public into a minefield which might eventually expose them to more risks resulting in even costlier legal fees.
What about criminal cases involving the liberty of the accused? Would a layperson be able to fathom the factors and considerations taken into account by the judge during the mitigation process? It takes skills to persuade a judge, and these advocacy skills are not things easily grasped, even by lawyers themselves.
What about bails? Would the public be able to distinguish the difference between a bond and a bail? Or perhaps the difference between a bailable offence, non-bailable offence and unbailable offence? These are essentially important aspects of the law a layperson has to understand.
Secondly, it is certainly true that a liberalised legal profession would mean end users benefit the most. Generally, price will go down and quality will be improved when there is stiffer competition.
However, it is very misleading to cite the Alternative Business Structure (ABS) in UK as a perfect example for the public to do their own S&P agreements. The ABS which was formed in 2011 through the Legal Services Act 2007 allows non-law firms to own legal practices. It is a game changer not for laypersons, but for firms or multi-national companies to provide competition in the market.
As of January 2014, a report by LexisNexis has shown that 136 law firms (mainly small firms) have closed down. And in the UK’s case, it is because the big firms running ABS has gobbled up a big share of the legal services market.
These ABS ‘outlets’ are run by laypersons. There are strict rules and conditions attached to be fulfilled before a license is obtained, for example the strict requirement for a certain percentage of lawyers to be on board. They sit through courses and tests in order to obtain the license. Hence, are they really laypeople after all? Not really.
It is very easy for proponents to turn this into a rice bowl argument, but are all lawyers rich as perceived? Certainly not, because we are seeing small law firms closing down because they cannot eke a living. In the present system, the legal profession is an open market and you are free to choose your lawyers. If indeed lawyers are bound by the law to charge a certain percentage, then the problem does not lie with the lawyers but the legislation.
Accorded, there are lawyers who do not take pride in the works they do and only care about the overcharging perhaps, but that does not warrant for the whole legal profession to be undermined.
Look at the nitty-gritty and consider the pitfalls of it. Is it really feasible and beneficiary for a layperson? Ultimately, as members of the distinguished legal profession upholding justice, the worst thing one can be accused of is to lead the public into a minefield.
Adrian Lim
Fri Sep 26 2014
Who really benefits from boilerplate legal documents?
Piala Asia B-23: Indonesia tekad roboh benteng kebal Uzbekistan
Bintang skuad Garuda Muda, Witan Sulaeman, teruja dengan peluang untuk melakar lebih banyak sejarah ketika membuat persiapan menghadapi aksi separuh akhir PIala Asia B-23 malam ini.
Airbus RACER helikopter terpantas dunia?
Ketika masih dikenali sebagai pesawat eksperimen X3, ia memegang rekod sebagai helikopter terpantas dengan kelajuan mencecah 472 km/j.
AWANI Ringkas: Letupan bom di Thailand | Hadapi dua pertuduhan
Ikuti rangkuman berita utama yang menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari di Astro AWANI menerusi AWANI Ringkas.
Mesyuarat Khas WEF: Tekanan politik dalaman punca Israel ‘menggila’ - PM Jordan, Mesir
Kedua-dua perdana menteri negara Asia Barat itu setuju serangan ketenteraan di Rafah hanya akan memburukkan keadaan yang sudah sedia meruncing.
Tingkat kawalan di sempadan tangani kemasukan kambing, lembu murah menjelang Aidiladha
KPKM meminta jabatan dan agensi kerajaan berkaitan kawalan sempadan memperhebat penguatkuasaan serta kawalan di pintu masuk negara bagi menangani kemasukan kambing dan lembu murah menjelang Aidiladha.
Mahkamah tolak permohonan pemilik akaun media sosial mulakan semakan kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi menolak permohonan pemilik akaun media sosial untuk mendapatkan kebenaran bagi memulakan prosiding semakan kehakiman terhadap MCMC.
KOM beri tiga atlet kebebasan pilih SUKMA atau kejohanan dunia
KOM memberi kebebasan kepada tiga atlet muda kebangsaan, untuk memilih sama ada mewakili negeri ke SUKMA atau menyahut cabaran negara pada Kejohanan Olahraga Dunia Bawah 20 tahun (B-20) 2024.
Anggota polis didakwa terima rasuah beri tembakau kepada tahanan lokap
Seorang anggota polis berpangkat koperal berhadapan dua pertuduhan menerima rasuah sebagai balasan membawa masuk barang terlarang kepada tahanan lokap.
SPRM sahkan tiada penyelewengan, rasuah dikesan dalam projek NTC setakat ini
SPRM mengesahkan tidak menemui sebarang penyelewengan serta rasuah setakat ini berhubung cadangan projek pembinaan National Training Center (NTC) di Putrajaya yang dianggar bernilai RM25 juta.
WEF: Perdagangan Malaysia, Arab Saudi boleh diperkukuh menerusi kerjasama - Tengku Zafrul
Kerjasama Malaysia-Arab Saudi dengan saling memanfaat kekuatan antara satu sama lain dapat menyokong pertumbuhan perdagangan dan pelaburan.
Do postponements cause delays in the Courts?
Cases may often be postponed or otherwise delayed for various reasons. The truth of the matter is that these delays may be necessary due to the Rule of law and due process.